
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Determining the Highest Point of the Arch (HPA)</title>
<link>https://www.pedorthics.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1795155</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:57:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:15:16 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2024 Pedorthic Footcare Association</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.pedorthics.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1795155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Determining the Highest Point of the Arch (HPA)</title>
<link>https://www.pedorthics.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1795155</link>
<guid>https://www.pedorthics.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1795155</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 13.5pt;">I would like some to hear comments regarding where the <strong>highest point of the arch (HPA) </strong>exists relative to the <strong>heel</strong> and <strong>forefoot</strong>. I take it that it would be where the navicular tuberosity lies, but this may not be the case; <em>does anyone know this</em>? Now I realize that there is an infinite variation of the actual height of the arch at HPA, <em>but where is this</em>?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13.5pt;">If you were to draw a line from the medial 1st met head to the medial heel on a footprint (say a Harris mat), where (approximately) would be the HPA? I have had no success in finding biomechanical literature on this subject. Is there some formula one might adapt from autopsy findings?&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13.5pt;"><em>Submitted by</em>: Jim Fisher, DPM, Eureka, CA</span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:15:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
